linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.7 129/184] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix an off-by-one in address filter configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160922174054.237814384@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:41:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>, vince@...ter.net,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.7 129/184] perf/x86/intel/pt: Fix an off-by-one in address filter configuration

4.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>

commit 95f60084acbcee6c466256cf26eb52191fad9edc upstream.

PT address filter configuration requires that a range is specified by
its first and last address, but at the moment we're obtaining the end
of the range by adding user specified size to its start, which is off
by one from what it actually needs to be.

Fix this and make sure that zero-sized filters don't pass the filter
validation.

Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: vince@...ter.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160915151352.21306-2-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
@@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@ static int pt_event_addr_filters_validat
 
 	list_for_each_entry(filter, filters, entry) {
 		/* PT doesn't support single address triggers */
-		if (!filter->range)
+		if (!filter->range || !filter->size)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 		if (!filter->inode && !kernel_ip(filter->offset))
@@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ static void pt_event_addr_filters_sync(s
 		} else {
 			/* apply the offset */
 			msr_a = filter->offset + offs[range];
-			msr_b = filter->size + msr_a;
+			msr_b = filter->size + msr_a - 1;
 		}
 
 		filters->filter[range].msr_a  = msr_a;