[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160922174846.GC1861@katana>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:48:46 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Peter Tyser <ptyser@...-inc.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT
table exists
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 03:30:53PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> ACPI WDAT table is the preferred way to use hardware watchdog over the
> native iTCO_wdt. Windows only uses this table for its hardware watchdog
> implementation so we should be relatively safe to trust it has been
> validated by OEMs
>
> Prevent iTCO watchdog creation if we detect that there is ACPI WDAT table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
BTW I assume this patch does not go via the i2c tree. Please tell me if
you think otherwise.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists