[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1474613175-23008-1-git-send-email-lv.zheng@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:46:15 +0800
From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...el.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <zetalog@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...ica.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] acpiexec: Move an acpiexec specific purposed new line to acpiexec specific file
> No need, Robert did it already:
>
> 1d435008fd9e ("Update an info message during table load phase.")
Not exactly what I meant. I meant the following on top of the above
mentioned commit. As the newline is an acpiexec specific logic, it should
be kept in acpiexec, shouldn't be left polluting a common file. Lv Zheng.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
--
Index: acpica/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
===================================================================
--- acpica.orig/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
+++ acpica/source/components/tables/tbxfload.c
@@ -348,11 +348,6 @@ AcpiTbLoadNamespace (
Status = AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
}
-#ifdef ACPI_APPLICATION
- ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW ((ACPI_DB_INIT, "\n"));
-#endif
-
-
UnlockAndExit:
(void) AcpiUtReleaseMutex (ACPI_MTX_TABLES);
return_ACPI_STATUS (Status);
Index: acpica/source/tools/acpiexec/aetables.c
===================================================================
--- acpica.orig/source/tools/acpiexec/aetables.c
+++ acpica/source/tools/acpiexec/aetables.c
@@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ AeLoadTables (
Status = AcpiLoadTables ();
ACPI_CHECK_OK (AcpiLoadTables, Status);
+ ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT_RAW ((ACPI_DB_INIT, "\n"));
/*
* Test run-time control method installation. Do it twice to test code
Powered by blists - more mailing lists