linux-kernel - Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:42:06 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-QXL: Move three assignments in qxl_device_init()

> I will refrain from merging any more style/checkpatch/"code cleanup"
> patches from Markus until we start getting real, tested, bug fixes.

Can such a kind of feedback be also interpreted in the way that you insist
to keep some weaknesses which I tried to point in the Linux source code out
for another while?

How do you think about to clarify your ranking for various update candidates
in this software?

Regards,
Markus