[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb-hRjD+FmyZ4SKurp94V=HR3L90OLNc-6eUKuy9AK_Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:27 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: Add a binding for the RPi firmware GPIO driver.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:
> The RPi firmware exposes all of the board's GPIO lines through
> property calls. Linux chooses to control most lines directly through
> the pinctrl driver, but for the FXL6408 GPIO expander on the Pi3, we
> need to access them through the firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Aha
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-firmware.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +Raspberry Pi power domain driver
Really? :)
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible: Should be "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio"
Usually this is vendor,compat, is the vendors name "raspberrypi"?
> +- gpio-controller: Marks the device node as a gpio controller
> +- #gpio-cells: Should be <2> for GPIO number and flags
> +- ngpios: Number of GPIO lines to control. See gpio.txt
Is this ever anything else than 8? Else omit it and hardcode
8 in the driver instead.
> +- firmware: Reference to the RPi firmware device node
Reference the DT binding for this.
> +- raspberrypi,firmware-gpio-offset:
> + Number the firmware uses for the first GPIO line
> + controlled by this driver
Does this differ between different instances of this hardware or
can it just be open coded in the driver instead?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists