lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb-hRjD+FmyZ4SKurp94V=HR3L90OLNc-6eUKuy9AK_Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:57:27 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     linux-rpi-kernel <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: Add a binding for the RPi firmware GPIO driver.

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net> wrote:

> The RPi firmware exposes all of the board's GPIO lines through
> property calls.  Linux chooses to control most lines directly through
> the pinctrl driver, but for the FXL6408 GPIO expander on the Pi3, we
> need to access them through the firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>

Aha

> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-firmware.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +Raspberry Pi power domain driver

Really? :)

> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible:          Should be "raspberrypi,firmware-gpio"

Usually this is vendor,compat, is the vendors name "raspberrypi"?

> +- gpio-controller:     Marks the device node as a gpio controller
> +- #gpio-cells:         Should be <2> for GPIO number and flags
> +- ngpios:              Number of GPIO lines to control.  See gpio.txt

Is this ever anything else than 8? Else omit it and hardcode
8 in the driver instead.

> +- firmware:            Reference to the RPi firmware device node

Reference the DT binding for this.

> +- raspberrypi,firmware-gpio-offset:
> +                       Number the firmware uses for the first GPIO line
> +                         controlled by this driver

Does this differ between different instances of this hardware or
can it just be open coded in the driver instead?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ