[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160923102141.GA16189@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:21:41 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
strace-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <asarai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: strace lockup when tracing exec in go
On 09/22, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
> if (!sig_task_ignored(t, sig, force))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Do not ignore signals sent from child to the parent */
> + if (current->ptrace && current->parent == t)
> + return 0;
This doesn't look right in general, and this can't really help.
This assumes that the tracer will call do_wait() after mm_access()
fails, but this is not necessarily true.
Note also ptrace_attach(), -ERESTARTNOINTR means that the tracer won't
even return to user-space if SIGCHLD is ignored, the tracer will silently
restart the syscall.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists