[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f4cbe32-aa0b-0123-2f1c-f34a7f160797@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:55:05 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in
tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection
>> A special view on software simplicity can also lead to questionable intermediate
>> function implementation, can't it?
>
> I don't really follow. But in any case I do not see anything
> questionable in the current tilcdc_convert_slave_node() implementation.
I identified update candidates there like the following.
1. Delayed checking for null pointers
…
if (!slave || !of_device_is_available(lcdc))
…
2. Usage of a single jump label for (too many?) cases
…
goto out;
…
Can the corresponding exception handling become also a bit more efficient?
>> Would you like to care a bit more for efficiency and software correctness
>> around the discussed exception handling?
>
> No, I would not.
Thanks for this information.
I hope that the software situation can also be improved around
this design aspect somehow.
> For the moment I have more important tasks to do.
I know also that various open issues are competing for your software
development attention as usual.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists