[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f41a2f39-1d7d-9f40-92e5-66728ed126eb@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:07:30 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Christian König <deathsimple@...afone.de>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-TTM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations
> It's just the names like "out" or "restart" perfectly explain why the labels exists.
I have got an other impression.
> So they fulfill this requirement from the coding style as far as I can see.
Short identifiers might look more convenient in some cases because
they are quicker to type.
> So why do you want to change them?
1. I suggest to select identifiers also for jump labels which are more meaningful
and eventually unique for some function implementations.
2. How do you think about to add a single space character before any label?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists