[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b791118-2977-f607-b816-dd5e833cfc75@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:19:47 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-TILCDC: Less function calls in
tilcdc_convert_slave_node() after error detection
> iirc, there are Coccinelle rules that find code with unnecessary null
> checks and removes them.
This kind of software change is not needed here.
I find that a corresponding return value check happens one function call
too late.
> Although you probably made this complex enough that cocinelle would
> not find it. That is not a complement.
I imagine that scripts for the semantic patch language can find more
source code places where questionable disjunctions are used so far.
Would you dare to split any more condition checks?
> One should not make error handling/cleanup more complex than needed.
I see a need to improve not only correctness there but also a bit of
software efficiency.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists