| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ca2d158b-ebdd-a709-a63a-421a11d8ca0a@Netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:48:17 -0400
From: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFS: Use complete() instead complete_all()
Hi Daniel,
On 09/22/2016 07:54 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>
>
> Hi,
>
> Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that there
> might be more than one waiter. For -rt I am reviewing all
> complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones in the
> tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is that it can be
> uses inside IRQ context and that can lead to unbounded amount work
> inside the interrupt handler. That is a no no for -rt.
>
> Besides trying to analys all the code paths to the wait_for_completion()
> call and convince myself that there is only one waiter, I also run
> a few tests:
>
> - some fio benchmarks
> - pynfs
> -cthon04
Thanks for the patches, and for the extensive testing! I haven't tried them with xfstests yet, but They look okay to me otherwise. Assuming I don't see any new failures there I'll plan on adding them for v4.9.
Thanks,
Anna
>
> Non of them exposed any blocking threads etc. pynfs did showed some
> failures but I am guessing that is just missing implementation:
>
> pynfs/nfs4.1/testserver.py random:/home/nfs-test --force -v all
>
> EID50 st_exchange_id.testSSV : FAILURE
> NFS4Error: OP_EXCHANGE_ID should return NFS4_OK,
> instead got NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP
> LKPP1a st_lookupp.testLink : RUNNING
> LKPP1a st_lookupp.testLink : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_SYMLINK, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1b st_lookupp.testBlock : RUNNING
> LKPP1b st_lookupp.testBlock : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1c st_lookupp.testChar : RUNNING
> LKPP1c st_lookupp.testChar : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1d st_lookupp.testLookupp : RUNNING
> LKPP1d st_lookupp.testLookupp : PASS
> LKPP1f st_lookupp.testFifo : RUNNING
> LKPP1f st_lookupp.testFifo : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1r st_lookupp.testFile : RUNNING
> LKPP1r st_lookupp.testFile : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1s st_lookupp.testSock : RUNNING
> LKPP1s st_lookupp.testSock : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
>
> PUTFH1a st_putfh.testLink : RUNNING
> PUTFH1a st_putfh.testLink : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1b st_putfh.testBlock : RUNNING
> PUTFH1b st_putfh.testBlock : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1c st_putfh.testChar : RUNNING
> PUTFH1c st_putfh.testChar : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1d st_putfh.testDir : RUNNING
> PUTFH1d st_putfh.testDir : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1f st_putfh.testFifo : RUNNING
> PUTFH1f st_putfh.testFifo : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1r st_putfh.testFile : RUNNING
> PUTFH1r st_putfh.testFile : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1s st_putfh.testSocket : RUNNING
> PUTFH1s st_putfh.testSocket : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
>
> RNM1b st_rename.testValidBlock : RUNNING
> RNM1b st_rename.testValidBlock : FAILURE
> OP_CREATE should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_PERM
> RNM1c st_rename.testValidChar : RUNNING
> RNM1c st_rename.testValidChar : FAILURE
> OP_CREATE should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_PERM
>
> RNM2a st_rename.testSfhLink : RUNNING
> RNM2a st_rename.testSfhLink : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2b st_rename.testSfhBlock : RUNNING
> RNM2b st_rename.testSfhBlock : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2c st_rename.testSfhChar : RUNNING
> RNM2c st_rename.testSfhChar : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2f st_rename.testSfhFifo : RUNNING
> RNM2f st_rename.testSfhFifo : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2r st_rename.testSfhFile : RUNNING
> RNM2r st_rename.testSfhFile : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2s st_rename.testSfhSocket : RUNNING
> RNM2s st_rename.testSfhSocket : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3a st_rename.testCfhLink : RUNNING
> RNM3a st_rename.testCfhLink : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3b st_rename.testCfhBlock : RUNNING
> RNM3b st_rename.testCfhBlock : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3c st_rename.testCfhChar : RUNNING
> RNM3c st_rename.testCfhChar : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3f st_rename.testCfhFifo : RUNNING
> RNM3f st_rename.testCfhFifo : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3r st_rename.testCfhFile : RUNNING
> RNM3r st_rename.testCfhFile : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3s st_rename.testCfhSocket : RUNNING
> RNM3s st_rename.testCfhSocket : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
> EID50 st_exchange_id.testSSV : FAILURE
> NFS4Error: OP_EXCHANGE_ID should return NFS4_OK,
> instead got NFS4ERR_ENCR_ALG_UNSUPP
> LKPP1a st_lookupp.testLink : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_SYMLINK, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1b st_lookupp.testBlock : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1c st_lookupp.testChar : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
> LKPP1f st_lookupp.testFifo : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1r st_lookupp.testFile : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
> LKPP1s st_lookupp.testSock : FAILURE
> LOOKUPP with non-dir <cfh> should return
> NFS4ERR_NOTDIR, instead got NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
> PUTFH1a st_putfh.testLink : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1b st_putfh.testBlock : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1c st_putfh.testChar : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1d st_putfh.testDir : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1f st_putfh.testFifo : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1r st_putfh.testFile : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> PUTFH1s st_putfh.testSocket : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
> RNM1b st_rename.testValidBlock : FAILURE
> OP_CREATE should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_PERM
> RNM1c st_rename.testValidChar : FAILURE
> OP_CREATE should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_PERM
>
> RNM2a st_rename.testSfhLink : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2b st_rename.testSfhBlock : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2c st_rename.testSfhChar : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2f st_rename.testSfhFifo : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2r st_rename.testSfhFile : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM2s st_rename.testSfhSocket : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3a st_rename.testCfhLink : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3b st_rename.testCfhBlock : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3c st_rename.testCfhChar : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3f st_rename.testCfhFifo : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3r st_rename.testCfhFile : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
> RNM3s st_rename.testCfhSocket : FAILURE
> OP_LOOKUP should return NFS4_OK, instead got
> NFS4ERR_NOENT
>
> VF1r st_verify.testMandFile : FAILURE
>
> cheers,
> daniel
>
> Daniel Wagner (2):
> NFS: direct: use complete() instead of complete_all()
> NFS: cache_lib: use complete() instead of complete_all()
>
> fs/nfs/cache_lib.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/direct.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists