[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160923000851.GB36167@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:08:52 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bpf: Set register type according to is_valid_access()
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:56:47PM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> This fix a pointer leak when an unprivileged eBPF program read a pointer
> value from the context. Even if is_valid_access() returns a pointer
> type, the eBPF verifier replace it with UNKNOWN_VALUE. The register
> value containing an address is then allowed to leak. Moreover, this
> prevented unprivileged eBPF programs to use functions with (legitimate)
> pointer arguments.
>
> This bug is not an issue for now because the only unprivileged eBPF
> program allowed is of type BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER and all the types
> from its context are UNKNOWN_VALUE. However, this fix is important for
> future unprivileged eBPF program types which could use pointers in their
> context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Fixes: 969bf05eb3ce ("bpf: direct packet access")
Please drop 'fixes' tag and rewrite commit log.
It's not a fix.
Right now only two reg types can be seen: PTR_TO_PACKET and PTR_TO_PACKET_END.
Both are only in clsact and xdp programs which are root only.
So nothing is leaking at present.
Best case this patch is a pre-patch for some future work.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists