linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: mark xhci_unmap_td_bounce

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160923150837.GC13933@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:08:37 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
Cc:     mathias.nyman@...el.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, xie.baoyou@...aro.org,
        xie.baoyou@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: xhci: mark xhci_unmap_td_bounce_buffer() static

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:46:13PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c:608:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'xhci_unmap_td_bounce_buffer' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 
> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> so this patch marks this function with 'static'.

Any reason you aren't using sparse for all of these 'static' functions
you are finding?  It should be easier than using 'W=1'.

thanks,

greg k-h