linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: add stack frame dependency to alternative_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFza3RXE9v1+siao-nycvead07UTLmgA3+A1350yBPq9aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:23:53 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternatives: add stack frame dependency to alternative_call_2()

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

Works for me. So:

  Reported-and-tested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

but I don't think I'll apply this to my tree now, since it's largely
harmless, and we're already going to do an rc8 and I worry that it
will end up showing something else. But it probably would be good to
queue for the x86 tree for 4.9

                Linus