linux-kernel - Re: Input-gameport: Add the macro "pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c086dc37-d55e-4f1e-a704-4a9893dc730b@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Sat, 24 Sep 2016 20:45:27 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: Input-gameport: Add the macro "pr_fmt" for module "joydump"

> When a chorus of voices says to you that you are wasting
> their time, perhaps you listen to their song.

I am listening to some degree. - I guess that I am making some decisions
and conclusions in a way that you would prefer to be different.

I know that my update suggestions won't be liked by all contributors.

> It seems to me your patch proposals have a relatively high
> unapplied patch percentage

I agree here. - This impression can occur for a while.

I find that this situation is hardly avoidable according to my evolving number
of update suggestions.
In which time frames do you look for the corresponding software development process?

> and there is an increase in the number of upstream maintainers that ignore you.

It's a pity. - I hope that the corresponding software development can still
be continued in constructive ways.

> Yes, the overall number of patches should be minimized when
> the suggested patches are highly related.

I have got a special opinion about patch squashing. But I can consider it
also for this update step when a corresponding consensus could be
achieved between contributors.

Regards,
Markus