[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160924091535.0be0f371b3242b5552ee2d49@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:15:35 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] perf tools: Increase debug level of SDT debug
messages
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:38:40 +0300
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> Two SDT debug messages can occur for every DSO which is too noisy.
> Consequently, increase debug level of SDT messages.
OK, but why "4" would you choose?
Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/build-id.c | 4 ++--
> tools/perf/util/probe-file.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/build-id.c b/tools/perf/util/build-id.c
> index 5651f3c12f93..e528c40739cc 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/build-id.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/build-id.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static int build_id_cache__add_sdt_cache(const char *sbuild_id,
>
> ret = probe_cache__scan_sdt(cache, realname);
> if (ret >= 0) {
> - pr_debug("Found %d SDTs in %s\n", ret, realname);
> + pr_debug4("Found %d SDTs in %s\n", ret, realname);
> if (probe_cache__commit(cache) < 0)
> ret = -1;
> }
> @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ int build_id_cache__add_s(const char *sbuild_id, const char *name,
>
> /* Update SDT cache : error is just warned */
> if (build_id_cache__add_sdt_cache(sbuild_id, realname) < 0)
> - pr_debug("Failed to update/scan SDT cache for %s\n", realname);
> + pr_debug4("Failed to update/scan SDT cache for %s\n", realname);
>
> out_free:
> if (!is_kallsyms)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> index 6f931e442f14..436b64731f65 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-file.c
> @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ int probe_cache__scan_sdt(struct probe_cache *pcache, const char *pathname)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sdtlist);
> ret = get_sdt_note_list(&sdtlist, pathname);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - pr_debug("Failed to get sdt note: %d\n", ret);
> + pr_debug4("Failed to get sdt note: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> list_for_each_entry(note, &sdtlist, note_list) {
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists