[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160925103439.GA8119@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:34:39 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Marcel Xubuntu <fooglesucks@...il.com>
Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Patchwork [1/1] staging: ks7010: Attempt to structure
and format to standards
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 06:08:34PM +0200, Marcel Xubuntu wrote:
>
> Code formatting and structuring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@...il.com>
>
> ---
>
> Tested-by: Marcel Ricquier <fooglesucks@...il.com>
>
> Mostly code formatting, unapologetically a stepping stone for a potential
> refactoring with a knowledge seeking, following complete disclosure,
> ultimate goal.
> In case this fails, my backup plan is to have the world's record for the
> quickest kernel patch dismissal, either way it's a win. Did I win ?!
Why did you repeat this?
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> index b7337fd..8de2713 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks7010_sdio.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/mmc/card.h>
> #include <linux/mmc/sdio_func.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> -#include <asm/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
Patch is corrupted and can not be applied :(
Also, you didn't read the link I provided in the last review, please do
so and fix up the patch to only do one type of a thing at a time.
(hint, "fix all checkpatch issues" is not one thing...)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists