linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFxsT2SJuLsf+nT56m8tMZrxoc21uSgiKwaPB7Re37=Ghw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 25 Sep 2016 15:24:47 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, tbsaunde@...aunde.org,
        robert@...llahan.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT_NONE NUMA balancing

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Can I have an ACK from the involved people, and I'll apply it
> directly.. Mel? Rik?

Oh well. The patch looks fine to me and I want to include it in the
rc8 release, so I'll apply it. Worst comes to worst we can revert, but
I can confirm that it's trivial to trigger the BUG_ON() without the
patch, so..

                Linus