[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160926083625.GN28107@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:36:25 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm: Simplify drm_printk to reduce object size quite
a bit
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 07:18:34PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Remove function name and special " *ERROR*" from argument list
>
> $ size drivers/gpu/drm/built-in.o* (x86-32 defconfig, most drm selected)
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 5635366 182579 14328 5832273 58fe51 drivers/gpu/drm/built-in.o.new
> 5779552 182579 14328 5976459 5b318b drivers/gpu/drm/built-in.o.old
>
> Using "%ps", __builtin_return_address(0) is the same as "%s", __func__
> except for static inlines, but it's more or less the same output.
And for static inlines we more often want to know which of the many
callers triggered the error. We would have to play it by ear to see
which error messages need to be improved in cases where it not obvious
without the context of the static inline function name.
Lgtm, reducing the call size for DRM_DEBUG is a definite improvement.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Miscellanea:
>
> o Convert args... to ##__VA_ARGS__
> o The equivalent DRM_DEV_<FOO> macros are rarely used and not
> worth conversion
Today. I would rather see us to migrate to DRM_DEV (i.e. dev_printk) so
that the drm subsystem is consistent with the rest of the kernel and
providing the necessary information for syslog filtering.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists