[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160926160724.GA6739@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 18:07:24 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] (Was: BUG_ON in rcu_sync_func triggered)
Hello,
The patches do not depend on each other.
1/2 is the trivial fix, imo -stable material. The bug is very old it seems,
but today this race (leading to unbalanced unlock) manifests itself via
mysterious BUG_ON's in rcu/sync.c.
2/2 is old, I forgot to send it before. It was already reviewed by Dave and Jan,
but the generic/068 test from xfstests triggered the warning. This was fixed by
dbad7c993053 "xfs: stop holding ILOCK over filldir callbacks" so we can hopefully
kill the early-lockdep-release kludge.
Oleg.
fs/super.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists