[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160926125726.60352757@grimm.local.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 12:57:26 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@....com,
xlpang@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jdesfossez@...icios.com, bristot@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 6/9] sched/rtmutex: Refactor rt_mutex_setprio()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:32:19 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> @@ -3586,9 +3625,7 @@ void rt_mutex_setprio(struct task_struct
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - rt_mutex_update_top_task(p);
> -
> - trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio);
> + trace_sched_pi_setprio(p, prio); /* broken */
Not a very comforting comment to see during a review ;-)
I'll hold off giving a full review of this patch while in the airport.
My mind needs a bit more "quiet" to do this one.
-- Steve
> oldprio = p->prio;
>
> if (oldprio == prio)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists