[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609261327340.5483@nanos>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [x86-tip] strange nr_cpus= boot regression
CC'ed: Dou Liyang
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I've encountered a strange regression in tip, symptom is that if you
> boot with nr_cpus=nr_you_have, what actually boots is nr_you_have/2.
> Do not pass nr_cpus=, and all is well.
What's the number of possible cpus in your system?
> Bisection repeatedly goes as below, pointing to the nodeid merge,
> despite both timers/core and x86/apic (nodeid) being fine. Take tip
> HEAD, extract all of the commits from nodeid (plus the fix), and revert
> them in a quilt tree, the tree remains busted.
So you remove all the nodeid commits from tip/master and it's still broken?
> Checkout the timers/core merge commit, and merge nodeid with that, it is
> indeed bad.
> Bisecting takes you right the merge commit, with no commit
> being 'bad', see logs.
That's more than strange. An empty merge commit being the culprit.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists