linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] kill get_clock_tick

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:29:26 +0200
From:   Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] kill get_clock_tick_rate()

Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:

> Hi,
>
> This serie aims at killing get_clock_tick_rate() from pxa and sa1100 and replace
> it by clock API calls.
>
> I'd like to have this reviewed and acked afterwards at least by :
>  - Russell for the mach-sa1100 and sa1100_wdt.c
>  - Stephen or Michael for the clk-pxa25x.c
>  - Thomas or Daniel for the clocksource part
>  - Wim for sa1100_wdt.c
>
> If the review converges, I'd also like to take it through the pxa/for-next tree,
> or alternatively Russell's tree if there is a dependency I'm not seeing, for
> v4.10 cycle.

Hi Russell,

Would you have time within the next 2 weeks to give this serie a review and
maybe an Ack from the sa1100 impacted parts (that would be patches 2, 3 and 4) ?

I can also resend the serie if it's easier in your workflow.

Cheers.

--
Robert