[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87twd2bgtl.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 21:29:26 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] kill get_clock_tick_rate()
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
> Hi,
>
> This serie aims at killing get_clock_tick_rate() from pxa and sa1100 and replace
> it by clock API calls.
>
> I'd like to have this reviewed and acked afterwards at least by :
> - Russell for the mach-sa1100 and sa1100_wdt.c
> - Stephen or Michael for the clk-pxa25x.c
> - Thomas or Daniel for the clocksource part
> - Wim for sa1100_wdt.c
>
> If the review converges, I'd also like to take it through the pxa/for-next tree,
> or alternatively Russell's tree if there is a dependency I'm not seeing, for
> v4.10 cycle.
Hi Russell,
Would you have time within the next 2 weeks to give this serie a review and
maybe an Ack from the sa1100 impacted parts (that would be patches 2, 3 and 4) ?
I can also resend the serie if it's easier in your workflow.
Cheers.
--
Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists