linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b02ba7d-4a31-297a-bbbd-be26da615e7b@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2016 23:27:14 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver

On 26/09/2016 23:07, Rich Felker wrote:
> Ping. Is there anything that still needs to be changed for this driver
> to be acceptable?
> 

It is on my radar. I'm reviewing it.

Can you elaborate the workaround mentioned in the changelog. I have been
digging into the lkml@ thread but it is not clear if the issue is
related to the time framework, the driver itself or whatever else. Can
you clarify that ?

Regarding the previous version, did you reach a consensus regarding
per_cpu irq with Mark Rutland ?

Thanks.

  -- Daniel

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog