linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] PM / AVS: rockchip-cpu-avs: add driver handling Rockchip cpu avs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160926035511.GG17336@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:25:11 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Finlye Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
        srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
        heiko@...ech.de, robh+dt@...nel.org, frowand.list@...il.com,
        sre@...nel.org, dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, khilman@...nel.org, nm@...com,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        wxt@...k-chips.com, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
        rocky.hao@...k-chips.com, tim.chen@...k-chips.com,
        tony.xie@...k-chips.com, ulysses.huang@...k-chips.com,
        lin.huang@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] PM / AVS: rockchip-cpu-avs: add driver handling
 Rockchip cpu avs

On 12-09-16, 14:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 18-08-16, 16:52, Finlye Xiao wrote:
> > > +static int rockchip_adjust_opp_table(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > > +				     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table,
> > > +				     int volt)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> > > +	struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
> > > +	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> > > +
> > > +	if (!volt)
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +
> > > +	rcu_read_lock();
> > > +
> > > +	opp_table = _find_opp_table(cpu_dev);
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
> > > +		rcu_read_unlock();
> > > +		return PTR_ERR(opp_table);
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table) {
> > > +		opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(cpu_dev, pos->frequency * 1000,
> > > +						 true);
> > > +		if (IS_ERR(opp))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		opp->u_volt += volt;
> > > +		opp->u_volt_min += volt;
> > > +		opp->u_volt_max += volt;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	rcu_read_unlock();
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > 
> > I wouldn't prefer altering the opp tables from individual drivers at all. At the
> > least, it should be done via some helpers exposed by the core.
> > 
> > But before that I would like to hear from Stephen a bit as I recall he was also
> > working on something similar.
> > 
> 
> I had a patch to modify the voltage at runtime for the "current"
> OPP. Now that we have regulator and clk control inside OPP that
> became a little easier to do without having to do some notifier
> from the OPP layer to the consumers. I haven't had time to revive
> those patches though. Should we do that?

Perhaps yes, we should have a common place for doing all that.

> Does this need to modify
> anything besides the OPP the device is currently running at?

Finlye, can you please answer this ?

-- 
viresh