lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACQ1gAjPfM9pN5Y88rum=0a8nfp7VL=FoJCz3bhHxkJj7JdHpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:45:28 +0200
From:   Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] tty/serial: at91: fix hardware handshake with GPIOs

2016-09-22 15:20 GMT+02:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:47:32AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> Commit 1cf6e8fc8341 ("tty/serial: at91: fix RTS line management when
>> hardware handshake is enabled") broke the hardware handshake when GPIOs
>> where used.
>
> s/where/were/
ok.

>> Hardware handshake with GPIOs used to work before this commit because
>> the CRTSCTS flag (termios->c_cflag) was set, but not the
>> ATMEL_US_USMODE_HWHS flag (controller register) ; so hardware handshake
>> enabled, but not handled by the controller.
>>
>> This commit restores this behaviour.
>>
>> NB: -stable is not Cced because it doesn't cleanly apply on 4.1+
>> and it will also need previous commit:
>> "serial: mctrl_gpio: implement mctrl_gpio_use_rtscts"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
>> Fixes: 1cf6e8fc8341 ("tty/serial: at91: fix RTS line management when hardware handshake is enabled")
>> ---
>>  drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> index 2eaa18ddef61..e9b4fbf88c2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> @@ -2025,6 +2025,7 @@ static void atmel_serial_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state,
>>  static void atmel_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
>>                             struct ktermios *old)
>>  {
>> +     struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port = to_atmel_uart_port(port);
>>       unsigned long flags;
>>       unsigned int old_mode, mode, imr, quot, baud;
>>
>> @@ -2126,8 +2127,12 @@ static void atmel_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
>>               atmel_uart_writel(port, ATMEL_US_TTGR,
>>                                 port->rs485.delay_rts_after_send);
>>               mode |= ATMEL_US_USMODE_RS485;
>> -     } else if (termios->c_cflag & CRTSCTS) {
>> -             /* RS232 with hardware handshake (RTS/CTS) */
>> +     } else if ((termios->c_cflag & CRTSCTS) &&
>> +                !mctrl_gpio_use_rtscts(atmel_port->gpios)) {
>
> IMHO the behaviour of the hw controlled pins shouldn't change when
> mctrl_gpio is in use (if possible). But I don't understand the issue so
> I guess you need a better changelog.
Yes, the behavior of the CTS/RTS pins should the same whenever they
are GPIOs or not.
That was the case before commit 1cf6e8fc8341 ("tty/serial: at91: fix
RTS line management when
hardware handshake is enabled")
BUT, this commit (1cf6e8fc834) introduced the actual use of the
ATMEL_US_USMODE_HWHS flag.
This flags changes the way RTS/CTS pins are driven, and that's the
discussion we are having in patch 3/3.

>> +             /*
>> +              * RS232 with hardware handshake (RTS/CTS)
>> +              * handled by the controller.
>> +              */
>>               if (atmel_use_dma_rx(port) && !atmel_use_fifo(port)) {
>>                       dev_info(port->dev, "not enabling hardware flow control because DMA is used");
>>                       termios->c_cflag &= ~CRTSCTS;
>> @@ -2135,7 +2140,7 @@ static void atmel_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios,
>>                       mode |= ATMEL_US_USMODE_HWHS;
>>               }
>>       } else {
>> -             /* RS232 without hadware handshake */
>> +             /* RS232 without hadware handshake or controlled by GPIOs */
>
> When touching this line, please also do s/hadware/hardware/.
ok.
>
>>               mode |= ATMEL_US_USMODE_NORMAL;
>>       }
>
> Best regards
> Uwe

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ