[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17317e62-d9bf-4ab3-35b5-f2f9a4dcbedd@mentor.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:12:03 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <aalonso@...escale.com>,
<b38343@...escale.com>, <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
<van.freenix@...il.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: freescale: avoid overwriting pin config when
freeing GPIO
Hi Stefan,
On 09/27/2016 03:26 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
> If a GPIO gets freed after selecting a new pinctrl configuration
> the driver should not change pinctrl anymore. Otherwise this will
> likely lead to a unusable pin configuration for > the newly selected
> pinctrl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> ---
> This turned out to be problematic when using the I2C GPIO bus recovery
>functionality. After muxing back to I2C, the GPIO is being freed, which
> cased I2C to stop working completely.
IMHO this recent "i.MX I2C GPIO bus recovery" feature is kind of a hack,
for example I believe it breaks I2C bus driver initialization on i.MX31
boards, where today there is no pinctrl driver at all.
IMHO something like I've partially described in the recent "Requesting as
a GPIO a pin already used through pinctrl" topic should be done here.
Could you consider to add another pinctrl-1 group with alternative GPIO
line mux/config settings to an i2c controller device node and apply it,
when you need a bus recovery? You may find references how this kind of
dynamic pinctrl management is done within mmc/sd subsystem.
By the way did I miss a patch, which falls back to mux settings on
.gpio_disable_free call for non-Vybrid platforms?
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists