[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474992297.2731.13.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:04:57 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Simplify logging macros, convert DRM_NOTE to
DRM_NOTICE
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:58 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > Use a bit more consistent style with kernel loglevels
> > I'm not convinced this is worth doing if we're going to keep the
> WARN/WARNING discrepancy, and I don't think we should switch DRM_WARN
> to DRM_WARNING since it's so widely used.
There is no DRM_WARN inconsistency.
What is used is pr_warn and dev_warn, not pr_warning and dev_warning
Well, there are still a few pr_warning uses, but those
will eventually be removed/converted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists