linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFS: Use complete() instead complete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7075c3b-c640-e7ee-7dfb-2c37ff1a3caa@Netapp.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:15:19 -0400
From:   Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
To:     Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@...-carit.de>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFS: Use complete() instead complete_all()

On 09/27/2016 04:33 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 09/27/2016 09:42 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Failures: generic/035 generic/087 generic/088 generic/089 generic/126 generic/184 generic/285 generic/347 generic/350
>> Failed 9 of 62 tests
>>
>> Hmm, not sure if this good or bad. Does it help?
> 
> FWIW, running the same tests on non patched kernel gives the same result:

Thanks for testing!  If it has the same results before and after your patches then you should be good :).  I've seen different sets of failed tests for different underlying filesystems, so I don't think it's a big deal that we have different failed tests here.

Thanks again,
Anna

> 
> Failures: generic/035 generic/087 generic/088 generic/089 generic/126 generic/184 generic/285 generic/347 generic/350
> Failed 9 of 62 tests
> 
> 
>