[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wphx9o5n.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 20:46:12 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] kill get_clock_tick_rate()
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This serie aims at killing get_clock_tick_rate() from pxa and sa1100 and replace
>> it by clock API calls.
>>
>> I'd like to have this reviewed and acked afterwards at least by :
>> - Russell for the mach-sa1100 and sa1100_wdt.c
>> - Stephen or Michael for the clk-pxa25x.c
>> - Thomas or Daniel for the clocksource part
>> - Wim for sa1100_wdt.c
Thanks to all for tests and acks, queued to pxa/for-next.
Cheers.
--
Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists