lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160927191653.57ig7mh3ptjy3izi@atomide.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:16:54 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the arm-soc tree

* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> [160926 22:06]:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9b7141d01a76 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Drop legacy board file for n900")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   9132ce450bd1 ("ARM: omap2: fix missing include")
> 
> from the gpio tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former removed the file, so I did that) and can
> carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Yes thanks removing it the way to go.

Regards,

Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ