linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the asm-generic tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160927200126.GA16429@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Sep 2016 22:01:26 +0200
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the asm-generic
 tree

Hello, Arnd.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:59:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The merge solution seems correct, but this is one of only two trivial
> patches I have queued up for asm-generic this time, so I wonder if we could
> put the _notrace patch into the percpu tree that already has the
> raw_cpu_generic_read change to avoid the conflict.

I'll be happy to pick it up.  Can you please send me the patch
refreshed on top of percpu/for-4.9?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun