[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160927160326.61ca28a9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:03:26 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the arm64
tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm/Kconfig
between commit:
1d8f51d41fc7 ("arm/arm64: arch_timer: Use archdata to indicate vdso suitability")
from the arm64 tree and commit:
7b4d24d8c01d ("atomic64: no need for CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE")
from the akpm-current tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm/Kconfig
index 125657b602a4,2a50957c7bfb..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@@ -1,8 -1,6 +1,7 @@@
config ARM
bool
default y
+ select ARCH_CLOCKSOURCE_DATA
- select ARCH_HAS_ATOMIC64_DEC_IF_POSITIVE
select ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
select ARCH_HAS_ELF_RANDOMIZE
select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists