linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160928115717.66d493d7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:57:17 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc:     linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

Hi Dave,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c

between commit:

  6f00975c6190 ("drm: Reject page_flip for !DRIVER_MODESET")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  43968d7b806d ("drm: Extract drm_plane.[hc]")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (the latter takes the former into account, so I just used
the drm tree version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now
fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts
should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is
submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating with
the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell