[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57EB9635.8060103@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 06:06:45 -0400
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] cpu hotplug: Preserve topology directory after
soft remove event
On 09/28/2016 02:48 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:26:14AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>> I see now that the issue is not understanding the difference between physical
>> and soft thread removal. I will write that up and get back to everyone.
>
> You don't seem to understand that from the kernels POV there is no such
> distinction.
>
And I'm saying you're wrong. Unlike PCI, CPU sysfs unplug does not completely
remove the device from the kernel's knowledge. If that were the case then
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/online (and other files left after the unplug)
wouldn't exist.
If you do a physical removal (signaled via ACPI or interrupt) the entire device
is removed from the kernel's POV.
Yes, the sysfs removal is a subset of the physical removal. But the end result
is very different.
> There is only one unplug operation that caters to both cases. Therefore
> unplug needs to assume the most stringent (ie. physical) for things to
> work right.
See last comment above.
P.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists