[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd67b1e8-0ab1-b6a9-61a1-4da2b40f1ef5@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:57:55 +0300
From: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
CC: linux-drm <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: tilcdc: add a workaround for failed clk_set_rate()
On 09/27/16 18:29, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Some architectures don't use the common clock framework and don't
> implement all the clk interfaces for every clock. This is the case
> for da850-lcdk where clk_set_rate() only works for PLL0 and PLL1.
>
> Trying to set the clock rate for the LCDC clock results in -EINVAL
> being returned.
>
> As a workaround for that: if the call to clk_set_rate() fails, fall
> back to adjusting the clock divider instead. Proper divider value is
> calculated by dividing the current clock rate by the required pixel
> clock rate in HZ.
>
> This code is based on a hack initially developed internally for
> baylibre by Karl Beldan <kbeldan@...libre.com>.
>
> Tested with a da850-lcdk with an LCD display connected over VGA.
>
Could you rebase the fix on top of latest drm-next[1] (or my latest pull
request tag[2])?
The conflict is so big that it is better the check that the fix still
works after rebasing.
Best regards,
Jyri
[1] git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux drm-next
[2] https://github.com/jsarha/linux tags/tilcdc-4.9-3.1
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
> index 2087689..f2ff3b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_crtc.c
> @@ -636,22 +636,40 @@ void tilcdc_crtc_update_clk(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev;
> struct tilcdc_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
> unsigned long lcd_clk;
> - const unsigned clkdiv = 2; /* using a fixed divider of 2 */
> + unsigned int clkdiv;
> int ret;
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->dev);
>
> tilcdc_crtc_disable(crtc);
>
> + clkdiv = 2; /* first try using a standard divider of 2 */
> +
> /* mode.clock is in KHz, set_rate wants parameter in Hz */
> ret = clk_set_rate(priv->clk, crtc->mode.clock * 1000 * clkdiv);
> + lcd_clk = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev->dev, "failed to set display clock rate to: %d\n",
> - crtc->mode.clock);
> - goto out;
> - }
> + /*
> + * If we fail to set the clock rate (some architectures don't
> + * use the common clock framework yet and may not implement
> + * all the clk API calls for every clock), try the next best
> + * thing: adjusting the clock divider, unless clk_get_rate()
> + * failed as well.
> + */
> + dev_err(dev->dev,
> + "failed to set display clock rate to: %d\n",
> + crtc->mode.clock);
> + if (!lcd_clk) {
> + /* Nothing more we can do. Just bail out. */
> + dev_err(dev->dev,
> + "failed to read the display clock rate\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> - lcd_clk = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> + dev_info(dev->dev,
> + "falling back to adjusting the clock divisor\n");
> + clkdiv = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(lcd_clk, (crtc->mode.clock * 1000));
> + }
>
> DBG("lcd_clk=%lu, mode clock=%d, div=%u",
> lcd_clk, crtc->mode.clock, clkdiv);
> @@ -664,7 +682,6 @@ void tilcdc_crtc_update_clk(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> tilcdc_set(dev, LCDC_CLK_ENABLE_REG,
> LCDC_V2_DMA_CLK_EN | LCDC_V2_LIDD_CLK_EN |
> LCDC_V2_CORE_CLK_EN);
> -
> if (tilcdc_crtc_is_on(crtc))
> tilcdc_crtc_enable(crtc);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists