[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520afc01-7936-0d41-6d45-67bd88e7475b@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 13:55:17 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "yang.zhang.wz@...il.com" <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv
interrupt injection
On 28/09/2016 13:53, Wu, Feng wrote:
>> > - update_cr8_intercept is disabled if APICv, see vmx.c:
>> >
>> > if (enable_apicv)
>> > kvm_x86_ops->update_cr8_intercept = NULL;
> Which tree are you using, I am using linux kernel tree with Linux 4.8-rc7,
> and I only see the following code in vmx.c
>
> if(!cpu_has_vmx_tpr_shadow())
> kvm_x86_ops->update_cr8_intercept = NULL;
You're right, it was an older tree. On the other hand, 4.8-rc7 has this
in update_cr8_intercept:
if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
return;
:)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists