[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E959C4978C3B6342920538CF579893F01988120C@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 12:07:34 +0000
From: "Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "yang.zhang.wz@...il.com" <yang.zhang.wz@...il.com>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"Wu, Feng" <feng.wu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv
interrupt injection
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:kvm-owner@...r.kernel.org] On
> Behalf Of Paolo Bonzini
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 7:55 PM
> To: Wu, Feng <feng.wu@...el.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: yang.zhang.wz@...il.com; mst@...hat.com; rkrcmar@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: x86: do not use KVM_REQ_EVENT for APICv
> interrupt injection
>
>
>
> On 28/09/2016 13:53, Wu, Feng wrote:
> >> > - update_cr8_intercept is disabled if APICv, see vmx.c:
> >> >
> >> > if (enable_apicv)
> >> > kvm_x86_ops->update_cr8_intercept = NULL;
> > Which tree are you using, I am using linux kernel tree with Linux 4.8-rc7,
> > and I only see the following code in vmx.c
> >
> > if(!cpu_has_vmx_tpr_shadow())
> > kvm_x86_ops->update_cr8_intercept = NULL;
>
> You're right, it was an older tree. On the other hand, 4.8-rc7 has this
> in update_cr8_intercept:
>
> if (vcpu->arch.apicv_active)
> return;
>
> :)
Oh, right! :)
Thanks,
Feng
>
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists