lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1475083239-11292-1-git-send-email-fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:20:39 +0200
From:   Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteguia@...il.com>
To:     lidza.louina@...il.com
Cc:     markh@...pro.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteguia@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: Fix lines longer than 80 characters

All the chunks of the patch apply to comments save the first one.

Signed-off-by: Fernando Apesteguia <fernando.apesteguia@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
index e794056..5becb37 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
@@ -449,7 +449,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
 							       flags);
 				}
 			} else if (cause == UART_17158_XOFF_DETECT) {
-				if (!(brd->channels[port]->ch_flags & CH_STOP)) {
+				if (!(brd->channels[port]->ch_flags &
+				      CH_STOP)) {
 					spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock,
 							  flags);
 					ch->ch_flags |= CH_STOP;
@@ -554,7 +555,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_lsr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
 		 * Rx Oruns. Exar says that an orun will NOT corrupt
 		 * the FIFO. It will just replace the holding register
 		 * with this new data byte. So basically just ignore this.
-		 * Probably we should eventually have an orun stat in our driver...
+		 * Probably we should eventually have an orun stat in our
+		 * driver...
 		 */
 		ch->ch_err_overrun++;
 	}
@@ -949,14 +951,18 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
 
 	/*
 	 * If 0, no interrupts pending.
-	 * This can happen if the IRQ is shared among a couple Neo/Classic boards.
+	 * This can happen if the IRQ is shared among a couple Neo/Classic
+	 * boards.
 	 */
 	if (!uart_poll) {
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&brd->bd_intr_lock, flags);
 		return IRQ_NONE;
 	}
 
-	/* At this point, we have at least SOMETHING to service, dig further... */
+	/*
+	 * At this point, we have at least SOMETHING to service, dig
+	 * further...
+	 */
 
 	/* Loop on each port */
 	while ((uart_poll & 0xff) != 0) {
@@ -980,7 +986,10 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
 			ch = brd->channels[port];
 			neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(ch);
 
-			/* Call our tty layer to enforce queue flow control if needed. */
+			/*
+			 * Call our tty layer to enforce queue flow control if
+			 * needed.
+			 */
 			spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags2);
 			dgnc_check_queue_flow_control(ch);
 			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ch->ch_lock, flags2);
@@ -996,16 +1005,18 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
 
 		case UART_17158_TXRDY:
 			/*
-			 * TXRDY interrupt clears after reading ISR register for the UART channel.
+			 * TXRDY interrupt clears after reading ISR register
+			 * for the UART channel.
 			 */
 
 			/*
 			 * Yes, this is odd...
 			 * Why would I check EVERY possibility of type of
 			 * interrupt, when we know its TXRDY???
-			 * Becuz for some reason, even tho we got triggered for TXRDY,
-			 * it seems to be occasionally wrong. Instead of TX, which
-			 * it should be, I was getting things like RXDY too. Weird.
+			 * Becuz for some reason, even tho we got triggered for
+			 * TXRDY, it seems to be occasionally wrong. Instead of
+			 * TX, which it should be, I was getting things like
+			 * RXDY too. Weird.
 			 */
 			neo_parse_isr(brd, port);
 			break;
@@ -1020,8 +1031,8 @@ static irqreturn_t neo_intr(int irq, void *voidbrd)
 		default:
 			/*
 			 * The UART triggered us with a bogus interrupt type.
-			 * It appears the Exar chip, when REALLY bogged down, will throw
-			 * these once and awhile.
+			 * It appears the Exar chip, when REALLY bogged down,
+			 * will throw these once and awhile.
 			 * Its harmless, just ignore it and move on.
 			 */
 			break;
@@ -1239,7 +1250,8 @@ static void neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(struct channel_t *ch)
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * If our queue is full, we have no choice but to drop some data.
+		 * If our queue is full, we have no choice but to drop some
+		 * data.
 		 * The assumption is that HWFLOW or SWFLOW should have stopped
 		 * things way way before we got to this point.
 		 *
@@ -1332,7 +1344,10 @@ static void neo_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch)
 	neo_pci_posting_flush(ch->ch_bd);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
-		/* Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the FIFO. */
+		/*
+		 * Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the
+		 * FIFO.
+		 */
 		tmp = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->isr_fcr);
 		if (tmp & 4)
 			udelay(10);
@@ -1361,7 +1376,10 @@ static void neo_flush_uart_read(struct channel_t *ch)
 	neo_pci_posting_flush(ch->ch_bd);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
-		/* Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the FIFO. */
+		/*
+		 * Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the
+		 * FIFO.
+		 */
 		tmp = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->isr_fcr);
 		if (tmp & 2)
 			udelay(10);
@@ -1406,8 +1424,9 @@ static void neo_copy_data_from_queue_to_uart(struct channel_t *ch)
 			ch->ch_cached_lsr &= ~(UART_LSR_THRE);
 
 			/*
-			 * If RTS Toggle mode is on, turn on RTS now if not already set,
-			 * and make sure we get an event when the data transfer has completed.
+			 * If RTS Toggle mode is on, turn on RTS now if not
+			 * already set, and make sure we get an event when the
+			 * data transfer has completed.
 			 */
 			if (ch->ch_digi.digi_flags & DIGI_RTS_TOGGLE) {
 				if (!(ch->ch_mostat & UART_MCR_RTS)) {
@@ -1417,8 +1436,9 @@ static void neo_copy_data_from_queue_to_uart(struct channel_t *ch)
 				ch->ch_tun.un_flags |= (UN_EMPTY);
 			}
 			/*
-			 * If DTR Toggle mode is on, turn on DTR now if not already set,
-			 * and make sure we get an event when the data transfer has completed.
+			 * If DTR Toggle mode is on, turn on DTR now if not
+			 * already set, and make sure we get an event when the
+			 * data transfer has completed.
 			 */
 			if (ch->ch_digi.digi_flags & DIGI_DTR_TOGGLE) {
 				if (!(ch->ch_mostat & UART_MCR_DTR)) {
@@ -1474,7 +1494,8 @@ static void neo_copy_data_from_queue_to_uart(struct channel_t *ch)
 
 		/*
 		 * If RTS Toggle mode is on, turn on RTS now if not already set,
-		 * and make sure we get an event when the data transfer has completed.
+		 * and make sure we get an event when the data transfer has
+		 * completed.
 		 */
 		if (ch->ch_digi.digi_flags & DIGI_RTS_TOGGLE) {
 			if (!(ch->ch_mostat & UART_MCR_RTS)) {
@@ -1486,7 +1507,8 @@ static void neo_copy_data_from_queue_to_uart(struct channel_t *ch)
 
 		/*
 		 * If DTR Toggle mode is on, turn on DTR now if not already set,
-		 * and make sure we get an event when the data transfer has completed.
+		 * and make sure we get an event when the data transfer has
+		 * completed.
 		 */
 		if (ch->ch_digi.digi_flags & DIGI_DTR_TOGGLE) {
 			if (!(ch->ch_mostat & UART_MCR_DTR)) {
@@ -1550,7 +1572,10 @@ static void neo_parse_modem(struct channel_t *ch, unsigned char signals)
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Scrub off lower bits. They signify delta's, which I don't care about */
+	/*
+	 * Scrub off lower bits. They signify delta's, which I don't care
+	 * about
+	 */
 	msignals &= 0xf0;
 
 	if (msignals & UART_MSR_DCD)
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ