lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2016 07:45:43 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree

Hi Doug,

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:00:11 -0400 Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> That doesn't seem like a particularly good thing to put in.  Wouldn't
> you end up just reverting it later when they fix lustre?  And are you
> going to revert the revert when it breaks again and revert the revert of
> the revert when it's fixed again?  That just seems a lot of churn.  I
> thought it was generally accepted that things in staging might or might
> not work and if they don't, we don't care?  Am I wrong on that?

The allmodconfig build needs to work.  Linus does an allmodconfig build
as part of his testing ...

Part of the fix patch should reenable building of the currently broken code.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ