linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609291051020.4825@nanos>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:51:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
        juri.lelli@....com, xlpang@...hat.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        jdesfossez@...icios.com, bristot@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 5/9] rtmutex: Clean up

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> 
> Can this be rephrased to: "Returns true if preemption has been
> disabled and a call to rt_mutex_postunlock() is required (which will
> re-enable preemption)"

I agree with Steven that the comments should be rephrased.

Thanks,

	tglx