[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160929155401.GA5097@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:54:01 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, dhowells@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
peterz@...radead.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: [PATCH locking/Documentation 1/2] Add note of release-acquire store
vulnerability
If two processes are related by a RELEASE+ACQUIRE pair, ordering can be
broken if a third process overwrites the value written by the RELEASE
operation before the ACQUIRE operation has a chance of reading it.
This commit therefore updates the documentation to call this vulnerability
out explicitly.
Reported-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index ba818ecce6f9..a57679ec9441 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -490,14 +490,18 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties:
the subsection "MMIO write barrier"). In addition, a RELEASE+ACQUIRE
pair is -not- guaranteed to act as a full memory barrier. However, after
an ACQUIRE on a given variable, all memory accesses preceding any prior
- RELEASE on that same variable are guaranteed to be visible. In other
- words, within a given variable's critical section, all accesses of all
- previous critical sections for that variable are guaranteed to have
- completed.
+ RELEASE on that same variable in that same chain of RELEASE+ACQUIRE
+ pairs are guaranteed to be visible. In other words, within a given
+ variable's critical section, all accesses of all previous critical
+ sections for that variable are guaranteed to have completed.
This means that ACQUIRE acts as a minimal "acquire" operation and
RELEASE acts as a minimal "release" operation.
+ However, please note that a chain of RELEASE+ACQUIRE pairs may be
+ broken by a store by another thread that overwrites the RELEASE
+ operation's store before the ACQUIRE operation's read.
+
A subset of the atomic operations described in atomic_ops.txt have ACQUIRE
and RELEASE variants in addition to fully-ordered and relaxed (no barrier
semantics) definitions. For compound atomics performing both a load and a
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists