| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9dcd5ca2-6f0a-cc44-e4c7-774e706315c7@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 10:09:37 -0700
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Rui Teng <rui.teng@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm/hugetlb: check for reserved hugepages during
memory offline
On 09/29/2016 05:30 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 26-09-16 19:28:10, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
>> In dissolve_free_huge_pages(), free hugepages will be dissolved without
>> making sure that there are enough of them left to satisfy hugepage
>> reservations.
>
> otherwise a poor process with a reservation might get unexpected SIGBUS,
> right?
Yes, that is correct.
>
>> Fix this by adding a return value to dissolve_free_huge_pages() and
>> checking h->free_huge_pages vs. h->resv_huge_pages. Note that this may
>> lead to the situation where dissolve_free_huge_page() returns an error
>> and all free hugepages that were dissolved before that error are lost,
>> while the memory block still cannot be set offline.
>
> Hmm, OK offline failure is certainly a better option than an application
> failure.
I agree.
However, if the reason for the offline is that a dimm within the huge page
is starting to fail, then one could make an argument that forced offline of
the huge page would be more desirable. We really don't know the reason for
the offline. So, I think the approach of this patch is best.
--
Mike Kravetz
>
>> Fixes: c8721bbb ("mm: memory-hotplug: enable memory hotplug to handle hugepage")
>> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 +++---
>> mm/hugetlb.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 4 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> index c26d463..fe99e6f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>> @@ -450,8 +450,8 @@ static inline pgoff_t basepage_index(struct page *page)
>> return __basepage_index(page);
>> }
>>
>> -extern void dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>> - unsigned long end_pfn);
>> +extern int dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>> + unsigned long end_pfn);
>> static inline bool hugepage_migration_supported(struct hstate *h)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_HUGEPAGE_MIGRATION
>> @@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static inline pgoff_t basepage_index(struct page *page)
>> {
>> return page->index;
>> }
>> -#define dissolve_free_huge_pages(s, e) do {} while (0)
>> +#define dissolve_free_huge_pages(s, e) 0
>> #define hugepage_migration_supported(h) false
>>
>> static inline spinlock_t *huge_pte_lockptr(struct hstate *h,
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 603bdd0..91ae1f5 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -1437,22 +1437,32 @@ static int free_pool_huge_page(struct hstate *h, nodemask_t *nodes_allowed,
>>
>> /*
>> * Dissolve a given free hugepage into free buddy pages. This function does
>> - * nothing for in-use (including surplus) hugepages.
>> + * nothing for in-use (including surplus) hugepages. Returns -EBUSY if the
>> + * number of free hugepages would be reduced below the number of reserved
>> + * hugepages.
>> */
>> -static void dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>> +static int dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>> {
>> + int rc = 0;
>> +
>> spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>> if (PageHuge(page) && !page_count(page)) {
>> struct page *head = compound_head(page);
>> struct hstate *h = page_hstate(head);
>> int nid = page_to_nid(head);
>> + if (h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0) {
>> + rc = -EBUSY;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> list_del(&head->lru);
>> h->free_huge_pages--;
>> h->free_huge_pages_node[nid]--;
>> h->max_huge_pages--;
>> update_and_free_page(h, head);
>> }
>> +out:
>> spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>> + return rc;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1460,16 +1470,22 @@ static void dissolve_free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>> * make specified memory blocks removable from the system.
>> * Note that this will dissolve a free gigantic hugepage completely, if any
>> * part of it lies within the given range.
>> + * Also note that if dissolve_free_huge_page() returns with an error, all
>> + * free hugepages that were dissolved before that error are lost.
>> */
>> -void dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>> +int dissolve_free_huge_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>> {
>> unsigned long pfn;
>> + int rc = 0;
>>
>> if (!hugepages_supported())
>> - return;
>> + return rc;
>>
>> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += 1 << minimum_order)
>> - dissolve_free_huge_page(pfn_to_page(pfn));
>> + if (rc = dissolve_free_huge_page(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
>> + break;
>> +
>> + return rc;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> index b58906b..13998d9 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> @@ -1945,7 +1945,9 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>> * dissolve free hugepages in the memory block before doing offlining
>> * actually in order to make hugetlbfs's object counting consistent.
>> */
>> - dissolve_free_huge_pages(start_pfn, end_pfn);
>> + ret = dissolve_free_huge_pages(start_pfn, end_pfn);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto failed_removal;
>> /* check again */
>> offlined_pages = check_pages_isolated(start_pfn, end_pfn);
>> if (offlined_pages < 0) {
>> --
>> 2.8.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists