[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57EC8771.3000700@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 23:16:01 -0400
From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@...e.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] md/bitmap: Rename a jump label in location_store()
On 09/28/2016 03:55 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> writes:
>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:46:22 +0200
>>
>> Adjust jump labels according to the current Linux coding style convention.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/bitmap.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> Sorry but this patch is just plain ridiculous. It does not improve the
> code in any shape or form.
>
> 'out' as a label is perfectly legitimate and just as good as 'unlock'.
Agree, I also curious which document recorded the coding style convention.
Thanks,
Guoqing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists