[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1475181593.31297.25.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 22:39:53 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dm snapshot: Use kmalloc_array() in
init_origin_hash()
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:24 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 21:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Why doesn't that regex match on "ORIGIN_HASH_SIZE"?
>
> It does match.
If that regex does match, it being part of a negative test, the
specific checkpatch rule should be silent, shouldn't it?
Paul Bolle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists