[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1475183693.31297.36.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 23:14:53 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dm snapshot: Use kmalloc_array() in
init_origin_hash()
On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:56 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It doesn't matter match either way to me.
>
> The case for the unnecessary multiply with <= gcc 4.8 was
> removed with:
>
> commit 91c6a05f72a996bee5133e76374ab3ad7d3b9b72
> Author: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> Date: Tue Jul 26 15:22:08 2016 -0700
>
> mm: faster kmalloc_array(), kcalloc()
>
> When both arguments to kmalloc_array() or kcalloc() are known at compile
> time then their product is known at compile time but search for kmalloc
> cache happens at runtime not at compile time.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160627213454.GA2440@p183.telecom.by
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
You've lost me.
Why does this stop you fixing an apparently wrong checkpatch rule,
crude as parts of it are (ie, uppercase identifier must be a constant)?
Paul Bolle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists