[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b401cb59-3545-758e-2f5a-2245651e8314@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:09:34 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@....samsung.com>
CC: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the v4l-dvb tree
Le 30/09/2016 à 05:33, Stephen Rothwell a écrit :
> Hi Greg,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> 71fb2c74287d ("[media] MAINTAINERS: atmel-isc: add entry for Atmel ISC")
>
> from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
>
> 5615c3715749 ("MAINTAINERS: update entry for atmel_serial driver")
>
> from the tty tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Both changes are merged well. Thanks Stephen,
--
Nicolas Ferre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists