[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANqRtoR+Jm6VOtB-NKrkGZuL=+Ra2Ce5aJRAJ2OS7KR4je7LSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 16:25:36 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: sh_cmt: Document r8a779[34] SoC specific bindings
Hi Geert,
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> And these are planned to be removed again with Magnus'
>>>> "devicetree: bindings: r8a73a4 and R-Car Gen2 CMT bindings"
>>>> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8579481/)?
>>>
>>> Sorry, that slipped my mind.
>>>
>>> Magnus, what is the status of that work?
>>
>> Banged my head against DT bindings too long, and I felt it never got
>> picked up so I gave up. =)
>>
>> It would make sense to update and resend, I do however wonder how to
>> improve our chances to get it merged?
>
> Looking in email history, the only comment you got on v4 was an accidental
> word duplicate. As you already had plenty of acks, resending with that
> fixed (and the code included again :-) should be enough.
>
> Note that I've been running that code since the first half of 2015 ;-)
Will fix up and resend. I recall that some more effort is needed to
clean up other parts of the bindings too, but that can be done
incrementally.
Cheers,
/ magnus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists