[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160930085111.GF19738@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:51:11 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/12] dax: correct dax iomap code namespace
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:49:27PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> The recently added DAX functions that use the new struct iomap data
> structure were named iomap_dax_rw(), iomap_dax_fault() and
> iomap_dax_actor(). These are actually defined in fs/dax.c, though, so
> should be part of the "dax" namespace and not the "iomap" namespace.
> Rename them to dax_iomap_rw(), dax_iomap_fault() and dax_iomap_actor()
> respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
I don't really care either way, but this is trivial enought to not
introduce a bug, so:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists