[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160930100603.GB13620@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:06:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 03/10] md/dm-crypt: Rename a jump label in
crypt_message()
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 05:43:57PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > In what bizzaro world is the "current Linux coding style convention"
>
> Do you look at the evolution for a document like "CodingStyle"?
>
Again, I wrote the paragraph in CodingStyle. I just said that it's a
good idea to think about label names instead of using GW-BASIC style
numbered labels, I didn't say go around bothering everyone with waste
of time cleanup patches.
I specifically did not say that "out:" or "error:" labels are bad names.
Those are common style in the kernel.
Please stop sending these patches.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists