[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d69995c-64c8-8a60-f6c0-2788af008e92@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:54:32 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: md/dm-crypt: Rename a jump label in crypt_message() ?
> If you continue discussing after that point,
I guess that such a condition is not needed.
> then you make a clear statement that it isn't an accident.
I hope that most of my software development activities are not "an accident".
Is the intent for any update suggestion (like the renaming of a jump label
in this case) reasonable to some degree?
> You are deliberately wasting their time.
I imagine that I do not really try to "waste" others time. But I am trying
also to change some "things".
There are circumstances when these contributions are interpreted as "wasted efforts".
Is the change acceptance usually higher for other update patterns?
> Something along "I will not listen.
I am listening while my responses might not fit to your current expectations.
> I will not change.
I have got also some personal change opportunities.
> Nothing you tell me will ever make it worth your time to do so"?
While you can be so clear about a rejection for this software module at the moment,
other contributors showed occasionally more positive information.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists